Search Results:

<< Viewing Record 107 of 231 >>
View : Light Box | List View | Image List | Detailed
 


Culture:English
Title:print: General Amherst
Date Made:1804-1814
Type:Print
Materials:paper, ink
Place Made:United Kingdom; England; London
Measurements:Sheet: 7 5/16 x 4 1/2 in; 18.6 x 11.4 cm
Accession Number:  HD 78.104
Museum Collection:  Historic Deerfield
1978-104_unframedt.jpg

Description:
Black and white engraving of an oval bust portrait of "General Amherst," and inscribed "Engraved for The Universal Magazine," which was published from 1804-1814, and "For J. Hinton at the King's Arms in Newgate Street." In 1758, Prime Minister William Pitt the elder (1708-1778) sent Jeffrey Amherst (1717-1797) from England to lead the British assault on Louisbourg, one of the battles of the French & Indian War (1754-1763). Amherst, newly promoted to major-general, captured the key French bastion on Cape Breton Island on July 27, 1758. This victory opened the St. Lawrence River to future British incursions, and Amherst was named commander-in-chief in North America. A three-pronged attack against French Canada was planned for 1759: a westward push up the St. Lawrence to Quebec, a northward invasion from Albany by way of lakes George and Champlain, and the quelling of French strength in the West at Fort Niagara. All major objectives were met during the “Year of Victories” with Amherst playing a direct role in occupying former French positions at Fort Ticonderoga and Crown As a reward for his success, Amherst was appointed governor-general of British North America, a position he held until 1763. However. Amherst was unable to suppress Pontiac’s Rebellion to his superiors' satisfaction, and he was recalled to London. In addition, allegations have persisted that Amherst was responsible for conducting an early form of germ warfare against warring Native Americans, a group he and others of his era held in extremely low regard. A letter still exists in which Amherst raises the possibility of conveying smallpox-infected blankets into Indian hands. Historians’ views differ on whether or not the plan was actually executed, but the tribes in western Pennsylvania were struck by a devastating outbreak of the disease at this time. Because of his close ties with many Americans, Amherst refused to take a field command during the War for Independence. He did, however, serve in an advisory role for the British cause. Despite the setbacks in his career, Amherst was widely celebrated for his achievements. He was knighted in 1761, made a baron in 1776, and promoted to field marshal shortly in 1778. Both Amherst, Massachusetts, and Amherst College were named in his honor.

Tags:
military

Link to share this object record:
https://museums.fivecolleges.edu/detail.php?t=objects&type=ext&id_number=HD+78.104

Research on objects in the collections, including provenance, is ongoing and may be incomplete. If you have additional information or would like to learn more about a particular object, please email fc-museums-web@fivecolleges.edu.

<< Viewing Record 107 of 231 >>